Apple M4 (iPad) vs MediaTek Helio G200

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Apple M4 (iPad) (99/100)

Apple M4 (iPad) leads overall with a score of 99/100 compared to MediaTek Helio G200 (31/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Why choose Apple M4 (iPad):
  • + Higher Performance score (99 vs 26)

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
NanoReview Score 99.0 Excellent —
Performance 99.0 Excellent WINNER 26.0 Poor
DeviceBenchmark Score — 31.0 Poor

Detailed Technical Specifications

3DMark

3DMark specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Graphics test 26 FPS —
Section 1 63 FPS —
Section 2 56 FPS —
Section 3 43 FPS —
Stability 71% —
Graphics test — 1 FPS

AI Accelerator

AI Accelerator specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
NPU theoretical performance 38 TOPS —
Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine —
Neural processor (NPU) — Yes

AnTuTu 11

AnTuTu 11 specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
CPU 915032 214794
GPU 1135331 46951
Memory 349968 174399
Total score 3116013 —
UX 715682 167424
Total score — 603568

CPU

CPU specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Architecture 4x 4.41 GHz –6x 2.85 GHz – 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 10 8
Frequency 4410 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A —
L1 cache 192 KB —
L2 cache 16 MB —
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Process 3 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count 28 billion —
Instruction set — ARMv8.2-A

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
4G support LTE Cat. 24 —
5G support Yes —
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps —
Modem Snapdragon X71 —
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps —
Wi-Fi 6 5
4G support — LTE Cat. 13
5G support — No
Download speed — Up to 650 Mbps
Upload speed — Up to 150 Mbps

GeekBench 6

GeekBench 6 specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
API Metal Vulkan
Asset compression 501.5 MB/sec —
Background blur 54.3 images/sec —
Edge detection 2.32 Gpixels/sec —
Face detection 124.8 images/sec —
Feature matching 0.73 Gpixels/sec —
Gaussian blur 2.8 Gpixels/sec —
HDR 461.1 Mpixels/sec 62.9 Mpixels/sec
HTML 5 Browser 305.6 pages/sec —
Horizon detection 1.7 Gpixels/sec —
Image detection 416.7 images/sec —
PDF Renderer 317.1 Mpixels/sec —
Particle physics 4657.1 FPS —
Photo processing 139.8 images/sec —
Ray tracing 14.9 Mpixels/sec —
Samples 7 tests 12 tests
Stereo matching 164.7 Gpixels/sec —
Asset compression — 96.3 MB/sec
Background blur — 5.52 images/sec
Edge detection — 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Face detection — 1.23 images/sec
Feature matching — 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur — 0.07 Gpixels/sec
HTML 5 Browser — 50.5 pages/sec
Horizon detection — 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Image detection — 38.6 images/sec
PDF Renderer — 72.5 Mpixels/sec
Particle physics — 229.7 FPS
Photo processing — 18.9 images/sec
Ray tracing — 2.85 Mpixels/sec
Stereo matching — 4.12 Gpixels/sec

Graphics

Graphics specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
FLOPS 3763.2 Gigaflops 140.8 Gigaflops
GPU frequency 1470 MHz —
DirectX version — 12
GPU frequency — 1100 MHz
OpenCL version — 2.0
Pipelines — 2
Shading units — 32
Total shaders — 64
Vulkan version — 1.3

Info

Info specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Announced May 2024 May 2025
Class Flagship Mid range
Official page — MediaTek Helio G200 official site

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Bus 8x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 120 Gb/s —
Max size 24 GB —
Memory frequency 7500 MHz —
Memory type LPDDR5X —
Max bandwidth — 17 Gb/s
Max size — 12 GB
Memory frequency — 2133 MHz
Memory type — LPDDR4X

Multimedia (ISP)

Multimedia (ISP) specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Audio codecs - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV —
Max display resolution 2752 x 2064 —
Storage type NVMe —
Video capture 4K at 60FPS —
Video codecs - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 —
Video playback 4K at 60FPS —
Audio codecs — - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV
Max camera resolution — 1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Max display resolution — 2520 x 1080
Storage type — UFS 2.2
Video capture — 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video codecs — - H.264- H.265- VP9
Video playback — 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Date Benchmark Benchmark
📘 2024-07-01(Aoul) GeekBench GPU —
📘 2024-07-10(Vlad) GeekBench GPU —
📘 2025-09-13(Yusuf baser) GeekBench CPU —
📘 2026-04-26(BG-M4-User) GeekBench GPU —
📘 2026-08-03(Astreeek) AnTuTu —
📘 2026-07-03(Juan david) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-23(Not telling) — GeekBench CPU
📘 2026-07-23(gOosetech) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-07-24(Abdul) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-07(Yann) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-14(Rana Zain) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-23(wantrelax) — AnTuTu
📘 2026-08-25(Бeдeнкo Гpигopий) — AnTuTu

PCMark 3.0

PCMark 3.0 specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
Data manipulation score — 6596
Phones tested — 4 models
Photo editing score — 24766
Video editing score — 6350
Web score — 10906
Writing score — 12775

Smartphones

Smartphones specifications comparison
Specification Apple M4 (iPad) MediaTek Helio G200
1.Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus — 616665
2.Infinix Hot 60 Pro Plus — 613238
3.Infinix Hot 60 Pro — 608673
4.Tecno Camon 50 4G — 595376
5.Tecno Spark Slim — 591552
6.Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G — 591254
7.Tecno Camon Slim — 576430
8.Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G — 569394
Phones with Helio G200 — AnTuTu v11

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Apple M4 (iPad) vs Xiaomi Xring O3 Apple M4 (iPad) vs Apple M5 (iPad) Apple M4 (iPad) vs Apple M3 (iPad) Apple M4 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Browse Mobile Processors Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →