Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xiaomi Xring O3
[ VERDICT ]
Winner: Xiaomi Xring O3 (100/100)
Xiaomi Xring O3 leads overall with a score of 100/100 compared to Samsung Exynos 2500 (78/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.
Why choose Xiaomi Xring O3:
- + Higher DeviceBenchmark Score score (100 vs 78)
- + Higher Performance score (100 vs 82)
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Normalized Lab Scores| Benchmark | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeviceBenchmark Score | 78.0 Good | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
| Performance | 82.0 Very Good | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | — |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | — |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | — |
| Section 3 | 29 FPS | — |
| Stability | 54% | — |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU theoretical performance | 59 TOPS | 200 TOPS |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 771016 | 1359147 |
| GPU | 723824 | 2143582 |
| Memory | 356421 | 941063 |
| Total score | 2289696 | 5228014 |
| UX | 438435 | 784222 |
CPU
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X9252x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A7255x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A7252x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 | 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro |
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3300 MHz | 4350 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.3-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | — |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
Connectivity
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | — |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Download speed | Up to 12100 Mbps | — |
| Modem | Exynos 5400 | — |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| API | Vulkan | — |
| Asset compression | 390.2 MB/sec | — |
| Background blur | 36.4 images/sec | — |
| Edge detection | 0.7 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Face detection | 15.1 images/sec | — |
| Feature matching | 0.23 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Gaussian blur | 1.6 Gpixels/sec | — |
| HDR | 309 Mpixels/sec | — |
| HTML 5 Browser | 179.4 pages/sec | — |
| Horizon detection | 0.45 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Image detection | 247.5 images/sec | — |
| PDF Renderer | 218.9 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Particle physics | 3446.8 FPS | — |
| Photo processing | 89.9 images/sec | — |
| Ray tracing | 12.7 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Samples | Less than 3 | — |
| Stereo matching | 82.2 Gpixels/sec | — |
Graphics
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| FLOPS | 4091.9 Gigaflops | 6554 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 999 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 1024 | 2048 |
| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Info
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2025 | August 2026 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9955 | — |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2500 official site | — |
Memory
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 24 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s | 113.8 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory frequency | 4800 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR6 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AAC- AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV | - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | — |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 11954 | — |
| Phones tested | Less than 3 | — |
| Photo editing score | 32035 | — |
| Video editing score | 8133 | — |
| Web score | 15720 | — |
| Writing score | 22532 | — |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark | — |
| 📘 2025-10-06(Fer2813) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2025-11-10(Letuchu) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2025-11-25(EverViolet) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2025-11-26->everviolet12 | GeekBench GPU | — |
| 📘 2025-12-19(Yell) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-01-01(Koss) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-05-16->INFC | AnTuTu | — |
Smartphones
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 | 2289696 | — |
| Phones with Exynos 2500 | AnTuTu v11 | — |
Looking for More Comparisons?
Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.