Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Xiaomi Xring O3
[ VERDICT ]
Winner: Xiaomi Xring O3 (100/100)
Xiaomi Xring O3 leads overall with a score of 100/100 compared to Samsung Exynos 2600 (93/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.
Why choose Xiaomi Xring O3:
- + Higher DeviceBenchmark Score score (100 vs 93)
- + Higher Performance score (100 vs 94)
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Normalized Lab Scores| Benchmark | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeviceBenchmark Score | 93.0 Excellent | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
| Performance | 94.0 Excellent | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | — |
| Section 1 | 51 FPS | — |
| Section 2 | 44 FPS | — |
| Section 3 | 39 FPS | — |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU | Yes |
| NPU theoretical performance | — | 200 TOPS |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 1023425 | 1359147 |
| GPU | 1236436 | 2143582 |
| Memory | 384525 | 941063 |
| Total score | 3161126 | 5228014 |
| UX | 516740 | 784222 |
CPU
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro | 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro |
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3800 MHz | 4350 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.3-A |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | — |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Process | 2 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 8 W | — |
Connectivity
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Download speed | Up to 14790 Mbps | — |
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | — |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Upload speed | Up to 4900 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| API | Vulkan | — |
| Asset compression | 459.4 MB/sec | — |
| Background blur | 41.7 images/sec | — |
| Edge detection | 1.41 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Face detection | 20.2 images/sec | — |
| Feature matching | 0.28 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Gaussian blur | 2.05 Gpixels/sec | — |
| HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec | — |
| HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec | — |
| Horizon detection | 1.03 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Image detection | 259.1 images/sec | — |
| PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Particle physics | 4524 FPS | — |
| Photo processing | 97.1 images/sec | — |
| Ray tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Samples | 8 tests | — |
| Stereo matching | 95 Gpixels/sec | — |
Graphics
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 Gigaflops | 6554 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 980 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
| Shading units | 448 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 1792 | 2048 |
| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Info
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2025 | August 2026 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9965 | — |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2600 official site | — |
Memory
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 24 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 Gb/s | 113.8 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory frequency | 5333 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR6 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3 | - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | — |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 16909 | — |
| Phones tested | Less than 3 | — |
| Photo editing score | 40764 | — |
| Video editing score | 8171 | — |
| Web score | 21279 | — |
| Writing score | 30248 | — |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark | — |
| 📘 2026-06-27(ainvine) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-12(nenenekete) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-17(ACoolioDude) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-25(Bui Tien Duong) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-26(Simon) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-29(David Vasic) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-08-11(Phrog) | GeekBench CPU | — |
Smartphones
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos) | 3161830 | — |
| 2.Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Exynos) | 3119822 | — |
| 3.Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 | 3113347 | — |
| Phones with Exynos 2600 | AnTuTu v11 | — |
Looking for More Comparisons?
Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.