Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Xiaomi Xring O3

[ VERDICT ] Winner: Xiaomi Xring O3 (100/100)

Xiaomi Xring O3 leads overall with a score of 100/100 compared to Samsung Exynos 8895 (25/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Normalized Lab Scores
Benchmark measurements and scores across compared devices
Benchmark Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
NanoReview Score 25.0 Poor 100.0 Excellent WINNER
Performance 19.0 Poor 100.0 Excellent WINNER

Detailed Technical Specifications

AI Accelerator

AI Accelerator specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
NPU theoretical performance 200 TOPS

AnTuTu 11

AnTuTu 11 specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
CPU 179410 1359147
GPU 79605 2143582
Memory 110545 941063
Total score 435852 5228014
UX 66292 784222

CPU

CPU specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Architecture 4x 2.314 GHz – Exynos M24x 1.69 GHz – Cortex-A53 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro
Cores 8 10
Frequency 2314 MHz 4350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.3-A
L2 cache 2 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Process 10 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W
Transistor count 3 billion
L3 cache 16 MB

Connectivity

Connectivity specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
4G support LTE Cat. 16
5G support No Yes
Bluetooth 5.0 6.0
Download speed Up to 1000 Mbps
Modem Shannon 355
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 7

GeekBench 6

GeekBench 6 specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
API OpenCL
Asset compression 79.3 MB/sec
Background blur 2.74 images/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Face detection 4.13 images/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.17 Gpixels/sec
HDR 51.8 Mpixels/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43.9 pages/sec
Horizon detection 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Image detection 14.7 images/sec
PDF Renderer 50.9 Mpixels/sec
Particle physics 628.1 FPS
Photo processing 11.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.23 Mpixels/sec
Samples 9 tests
Stereo matching 17 Gpixels/sec

Graphics

Graphics specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
FLOPS 262.1 Gigaflops 6554 Gigaflops
GPU frequency 546 MHz 1600 MHz
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
Pipelines 20 16
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 240 2048
Vulkan version 1.3 1.4
DirectX version 12.2

Info

Info specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Announced February 2017 August 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E8895
Official page Samsung Exynos 8895 official site
Successor -Samsung Exynos 2500

Memory

Memory specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 24 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.7 Gb/s 113.8 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 24 GB
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 5333 MHz
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR6

Multimedia (ISP)

Multimedia (ISP) specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Audio codecs - 192 kHz/24 bit - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400
Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 4.1
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264- H.265- VP9 - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS

Recent User Tests

Recent User Tests specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
Date Benchmark
📘 2026-05-16(Lucas) CPU Throttle
📘 2026-05-22->TranHongPhuc GeekBench CPU
📘 2026-06-03(leo) AnTuTu

Smartphones

Smartphones specifications comparison
Specification Samsung Exynos 8895 Xiaomi Xring O3
1.Samsung Galaxy Note 8 437463
2.Samsung Galaxy S8 430382
3.Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 427786
Phones with Exynos 8895 AnTuTu v11

Looking for More Comparisons?

Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.

Browse Mobile Processors Comparisons → Launch Full Comparison Hub →