Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Xiaomi Xring O3
[ VERDICT ]
Winner: Xiaomi Xring O3 (100/100)
Xiaomi Xring O3 leads overall with a score of 100/100 compared to Samsung Exynos 9610 (22/100), offering superior measured performance and technical specifications.
Why choose Xiaomi Xring O3:
- + Higher DeviceBenchmark Score score (100 vs 22)
- + Higher Performance score (100 vs 16)
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Normalized Lab Scores| Benchmark | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeviceBenchmark Score | 22.0 Poor | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
| Performance | 16.0 Poor | 100.0 Excellent WINNER |
Detailed Technical Specifications
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| NPU theoretical performance | — | 200 TOPS |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 149165 | 1359147 |
| GPU | 18580 | 2143582 |
| Memory | 94830 | 941063 |
| Total score | 365008 | 5228014 |
| UX | 102433 | 784222 |
CPU
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A734x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro |
| Cores | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 2300 MHz | 4350 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9.3-A |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 8 W | — |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | — |
| L2 cache | — | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | — | 16 MB |
Connectivity
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | — |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | — |
| Modem | Shannon 337 | — |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 7 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| API | OpenCL | — |
| Asset compression | 69.3 MB/sec | — |
| Background blur | 1.42 images/sec | — |
| Edge detection | 0.07 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Face detection | 1.38 images/sec | — |
| Feature matching | 0.02 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Gaussian blur | 0.05 Gpixels/sec | — |
| HDR | 43.1 Mpixels/sec | — |
| HTML 5 Browser | 32.1 pages/sec | — |
| Horizon detection | 0.07 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Image detection | 10.7 images/sec | — |
| PDF Renderer | 38.8 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Particle physics | 191 FPS | — |
| Photo processing | 6.67 images/sec | — |
| Ray tracing | 1.55 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Samples | 6 tests | — |
| Stereo matching | 4.95 Gpixels/sec | — |
Graphics
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| FLOPS | 40.8 Gigaflops | 6554 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 1053 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Pipelines | 3 | 16 |
| Shading units | 12 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 36 | 2048 |
| Vulkan version | 1 | 1.4 |
| DirectX version | — | 12.2 |
Info
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2018 | August 2026 |
| Class | Mid range | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9610 | — |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9610 official site | — |
| Successor | -Samsung Exynos 1580 | — |
Memory
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 24 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 11.9 Gb/s | 113.8 Gb/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR6 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV | - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | — |
| Max display resolution | 2560 x 1600 | — |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- VP8- VP9 | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 |
| Video playback | 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 5338 | — |
| Phones tested | Less than 3 | — |
| Photo editing score | 9306 | — |
| Video editing score | 5186 | — |
| Web score | 5152 | — |
| Writing score | 6344 | — |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark | — |
| 📘 2026-06-14(Irfan) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-03(Muhammet Tech) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-07-16(A50M max) | GeekBench CPU | — |
| 📘 2026-07-23(Muhammed tech) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-08-05(A50M Max 🇹🇷) | AnTuTu | — |
| 📘 2026-08-23(Gadji Tæmæv) | AnTuTu | — |
Smartphones
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi Xring O3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy A50 | 365008 | — |
| Phones with Exynos 9610 | AnTuTu v11 | — |
Looking for More Comparisons?
Browse all available head-to-head comparisons or select new devices in the comparison hub.