[ MEDIATEK ]
Mobile Processors
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Overall Score
48/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
428145
Graphics (GPU)
233006
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 48/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
48/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
46/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Graphics test | 5 FPS |
| Stability | 97% |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 580 |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 428145 |
| GPU | 233006 |
| Memory | 267125 |
| Total score | 1240821 |
| UX | 312545 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A783x 3 GHz – Cortex A784x 2 GHz – Cortex A55 |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 cache | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC |
| Process | 4 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 6 W |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | OpenCL |
| Asset compression | 172.8 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 14.7 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.23 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 2.93 images/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.07 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.19 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 118.4 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 108 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.24 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 86.2 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 140.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 955.6 FPS |
| Photo processing | 34.4 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.63 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 28 tests |
| Stereo matching | 10.3 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| FLOPS | 729.6 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 |
| Pipelines | 6 |
| Shading units | 64 |
| Total shaders | 384 |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | December 2022 |
| Class | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6896Z |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 official site |
| Successor | -MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 16 GB |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC- FLAC- HE-AACv1- HE-AACv2- MP3 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- AV1- VP9 |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 10859 |
| Phones tested | 11 models |
| Photo editing score | 32165 |
| Video editing score | 5571 |
| Web score | 11474 |
| Writing score | 20448 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2026-07-23(Maragidyne) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-28(RostFadeev) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-31->Le Hieu | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-01(Opan) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-01->Guzman | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-08-09->qngz_ | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2026-08-20(Zombiezcry) | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Infinix Zero 40 5G | 1315468 |
| 10.Xiaomi 13T | 1175951 |
| 2.Infinix GT 20 Pro | 1306340 |
| 3.Oppo Reno 11 Pro | 1292987 |
| 4.Vivo V30 Pro | 1272440 |
| 5.Vivo iQOO Neo 7 | 1241266 |
| 6.Tecno Camon 30 Premier | 1240821 |
| 7.Tecno Camon 30 Pro | 1230893 |
| 8.Vivo V27 Pro | 1219177 |
| 9.Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro | 1207095 |
| Phones with Dimensity 8200 | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).