[ QUALCOMM ]
Mobile Processors
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
Overall Score
31/100
Key Technical Specifications
Processor (CPU)
242759
Graphics (GPU)
50920
[ EXPERT VERDICT · SUMMARY ]
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is an engineering-tested mobile processors achieving an overall rating of 31/100. It is positioned for balanced everyday compute and power efficiency.
Benchmark Performance Scores
Normalized 0–100 Scale
NanoReview Score
Rating: Poor
31/100
Performance
Rating: Poor
24/100
Detailed Technical Specifications
3DMark
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Graphics test | 1 FPS |
AI Accelerator
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 694 |
AnTuTu 11
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU | 242759 |
| GPU | 50920 |
| Memory | 92020 |
| Total score | 566483 |
| UX | 180784 |
CPU
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A |
| L3 cache | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung |
| Process | 8 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W |
Connectivity
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 |
| Download speed | Up to 3700 Mbps |
| Modem | X52 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 |
Gaming
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 37 FPS[High] |
| Device | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite1080 x 2400 |
| Fortnite | 28 FPS[Medium] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 56 FPS[Ultra] |
| PUBG Mobile | 58 FPS[High] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 61 FPS[Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS[Ultra] |
GeekBench 6
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| API | Vulkan |
| Asset compression | 158.2 MB/sec |
| Background blur | 10.2 images/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.19 Gpixels/sec |
| Face detection | 2.58 images/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.04 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.14 Gpixels/sec |
| HDR | 94.1 Mpixels/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 67.9 pages/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.14 Gpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 55.2 images/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 111.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 242.4 FPS |
| Photo processing | 26.7 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 3.76 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 3 tests |
| Stereo matching | 3.29 Gpixels/sec |
Graphics
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| DirectX version | 12.1 |
| FLOPS | 409.6 Gigaflops |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 |
| Pipelines | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 |
| Total shaders | 256 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 |
Info
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Announced | September 2020 |
| Class | Mid range |
| Model number | SM7225 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site |
Memory
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gb/s |
| Max size | 12 GB |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Audio codecs | - AIFF- CAF- MP3- MP4- WAV |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264- H.265- VP8- VP9 |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS |
PCMark 3.0
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Data manipulation score | 7680 |
| Phones tested | 3 models |
| Photo editing score | 19274 |
| Video editing score | 6985 |
| Web score | 7576 |
| Writing score | 8986 |
Recent User Tests
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | Benchmark |
| 📘 2025-11-09(Jayjay) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-01-03(Mafra) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-04-02(Artur Enzo) | GeekBench GPU |
| 📘 2026-05-09->Luke | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-06-04(Jão) | AnTuTu |
| 📘 2026-07-28(Breno) | AnTuTu |
Smartphones
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| 1.Samsung Galaxy M23 | 566483 |
| 2.Motorola One 5G Ace | 540590 |
| 3.Motorola Moto G 5G | 484869 |
| 4.Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | 448186 |
| 5.Samsung Galaxy A42 | 436298 |
| Phones with Snapdragon 750G | AnTuTu v11 |
Strengths & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Comprehensive positive benchmark metrics recorded.
Key Considerations
- No major hardware limitations flagged during benchmark run.
Direct Competitors & Alternatives
XIAOMI
Xiaomi Xring O3
100/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M4 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M5 (iPad)
99/100
Compare →
APPLE
Apple M3 (iPad)
97/100
Compare →
Methodology, Provenance & Verification
Score version 2026.1 · Data verified 2026-08-26 · Source: official manufacturer datasheets and standardized reproducible benchmark suites (Geekbench 6, Cinebench R24, 3DMark).